\u201cWe were told we\u2019d only have a few hours with the manuscript \u2013 just enough time to form an initial assessment of its authenticity. I focused on the ink, while an experienced conservator, Agata Lipi\u0144ska from the National Library, examined the paper. Professor John Rink from the University of Cambridge \u2013 one of the foremost experts on Chopin \u2013 studied the musical notation itself. The whole process was observed by the owner\u2019s representative, a lawyer, a conservator and collections curator, as well as Dr. Artur Szklener, director of the Fryderyk Chopin Institute,\u201d says Prof. Barbara Wagner from the Faculty of Chemistry at the University of Warsaw.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Only two manuscripts of this Ballade are known to exist. The one that entered the collection of the Fryderyk Chopin Institute in early 2025 has had a long and winding journey. After the composer\u2019s death in 1849, Chopin\u2019s sister passed it on to his friend Joseph Dessauer \u2013 also a pianist and composer. In 1933, the manuscript resurfaced in a secondhand bookshop in Lucerne, discovered by American collector Rudolf F. Kallira. A few decades later, several black-and-white photographs were taken \u2013 the only record of its existence at the time. For decades, the document was not seen by researchers or conservators, which, in Professor Wagner\u2019s view, ultimately worked to its advantage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cOver the years, conservators trying to preserve historic objects have experimented with a wide range of methods \u2013 many of which have not stood the test of time.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cBack in the 1960s and 1970s, there was a real fascination with chemistry. The prevailing belief was that if you understood chemical reactions, you could essentially control how they altered paper. To improve the appearance of manuscripts, various bleaching agents were used, including the once widely popular water-soluble compound chloramine T. It was a highly involved process \u2013 repeated chemical baths, hours of rinsing, and then neutralizing any remaining chloramine with sodium thiosulfate, followed by yet more rinsing. The goal was usually quite simple: to lighten paper that had naturally yellowed with age. The problem was that if those chemicals weren\u2019t fully removed, the reactions they triggered could end up causing long-term damage.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cToday, conservators are far more cautious with wet treatments, and a more restrained, almost purist approach has taken hold. Any intervention is weighed very carefully before it\u2019s carried out. There\u2019s also a growing awareness that better technical solutions may still emerge in the future, so we try to leave room for those possibilities. Even our sense of aesthetics has changed \u2013 an immaculate, bright white sheet is no longer considered a benchmark of successful conservation,\u201d explains Prof. Wagner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For that reason, and drawing on decades of accumulated experience, all the experts agreed that the manuscript had, fortunately, escaped those earlier conservation practices. Safely stored away in a vault for years, it had been largely untouched \u2013 until the decision to sell it finally brought it into the hands of researchers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A portion of the manuscript had been heavily crossed out, yet beneath the erasures the original notation remained visible. It revealed that Chopin later recopied the initially composed piece in a revised time signature \u2013 that is, with a reworked rhythmic framework altering how the measures are grouped and where the metric accents fall within the composition. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cMusicologists examining the manuscript were essentially looking at two versions of the melody \u2013 and they were absolutely delighted,\u201d recalls Prof. Wagner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It was not only the score of a composition, but also a record of the composer\u2019s creative process. At the press conference marking the acquisition of the document, both versions of the Ballade were performed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For musicologists, both the content and the compositional process served as confirmation of authenticity. And what did the chemist\u2019s analysis look like?<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe object under study was a musical manuscript on well-preserved, cream-colored paper, covered with musical notation and staff lines drawn in two shades of brown ink. The paper is well-sized, which ensured that the ink shows no signs of spreading within the paper structure and remains clearly legible. The manuscript is so valuable that the owner at the time agreed only to macroscopic and microscopic examination during the assessment. I therefore brought a portable digital microscope equipped with lamps emitting light at different wavelengths, along with a light table.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI examined the ink under a microscope and documented it across three regions of the electromagnetic spectrum \u2013 visible light (VIS), ultraviolet (UV), and infrared (IR). This allowed me to confirm that two different inks were used, each responding differently under varying wavelengths. The staff lines were drawn with a plant-based ink containing a small amount of inorganic salts, while the musical notation itself was written in the most widely used ink in Europe at the time \u2013 iron gall ink,\u201d explains the chemist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Iron gall inks (more broadly, metal\u2013tannin inks) were used for writing on paper supports well into the second decade of the 20th century. Their composition was often improvised, but they were always based on aqueous solutions of iron salts and plant extracts derived from galls. Galls are growths that form on the leaves, twigs, or fruit of various oak species. They develop after the gall wasp (Cynips gallea tinctoria<\/em>) lays its eggs inside the plant tissue, providing a protective chamber for its larvae, which later emerge as adults. Galls can contain up to 40% tannins, which is why tannin-rich extracts \u2013 obtained by heating galls in water \u2013 were historically used in ink production. In some cases, aqueous extracts from bark or other parts of locally available plants were also used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cMixing these plant extracts with transition metal salts \u2013 most commonly iron, but quite often copper as well \u2013 produced a suspension of black particles in solution, which effectively became the ink. The viscosity was then adjusted with a binder, most often gum arabic. Because the ingredients and their proportions varied so widely, iron gall inks could differ quite significantly both in color and in how they affected the writing surface over time,\u201d says Prof. Wagner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Macroscopic observations indicated the presence of iron gall ink in the manuscript, which would be consistent with its presumed date of origin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThese were among the most widely used inks in European history, but their chemical composition could vary quite significantly. Not all historical inks were properly balanced in terms of stoichiometry (that is, the quantitative ratios between their components \u2013 editor\u2019s note) \u2013 and in that respect, Chopin\u2019s manuscript appears to be a typical example of inks that are not chemically inert with respect to the writing support, as clearly visible in the images. You can see pronounced browning of the paper in areas covered with ink, as well as these color changes bleeding through to the reverse side of the musical notation, and especially in places where corrections or blot-like overwriting obscure the original notation. Similar effects, resulting from the long-term interaction between ink and paper, can be observed throughout the entire manuscript,\u201d notes the scientist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ink that is not chemically well-balanced can lead to the deterioration of documents through processes known as \u201cink corrosion.\u201d Over the long term, this may even result in the complete destruction of the paper in areas affected by such inks. For this reason, a four-level conservation risk scale has been developed to assess manuscripts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cMacroscopic examination of the ink was carried out under visible light, or white light. The changes induced in the paper by the ink point to a level II risk of \u2018ink corrosion\u2019 for the manuscript. In addition, we identified irregular stains ranging from pink to light cherry in color on the pages, resembling an aniline dye commonly used in stamp inks,\u201d Prof. Wagner reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A level II ink corrosion risk indicates the early stages of structural weakening in the paper. Discoloration \u2013 typically yellowish to brownish \u2013 can be seen around ink lines, showing that the substrate is beginning to lose strength in inked areas. This calls for the manuscript to be placed under continuous conservation monitoring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For Prof. Wagner, this was the second time in her career that she had examined an authentic Chopin manuscript, though of a different work. A few years earlier, she had studied the autograph of the Impromptu in A-flat major, Op. 29<\/em> at the Fryderyk Chopin Institute, using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF).<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIt\u2019s a non-invasive technique that records the elemental composition when the spectrometer is brought into contact with the surface of the object being examined. Put simply, you place a probe directly on the page and read the signals emitted by the elements present at that spot. That allows us to compare the composition of different areas and see whether they match or differ. Conservators are especially fond of these kinds of non-invasive methods because they\u2019re safe for cultural heritage objects,\u201d Prof. Wagner says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As the chemist notes, XRF does have its limitations: it is not very sensitive to light elements \u2013 aluminum, for instance, is only poorly detected, while sodium is essentially invisible. As a result, some characteristic information is lost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As with the Ballade, the analysis of the Impromptu<\/em> made it possible to distinguish between the different inks used by Chopin, those added by an editor who later annotated the score, and the ink of the staff lines. It also confirmed that during conservation treatments in the 1960s, a conservator reinforced the writing on the first page with a brown watercolor wash.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Further analysis revealed the presence of barium throughout the manuscript, which turned out to be the result of a treatment with barium hydroxide in methanol applied during a subsequent conservation process in the 1990s \u2013 a then-standard procedure used to raise the pH of paper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In short, the document held no secrets for the researchers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second tool Prof. Wagner reached for in her study of Chopin\u2019s Impromptu<\/em> was indicator paper strips. These are pieces of filter paper impregnated with a complexing agent, used by conservators since 2005. When they come into contact with iron in its +2 oxidation state, they change color. For conservators, this reaction provides a visual diagnostic signal confirming the presence of potentially aggressive iron gall ink \u2013 the type of ink responsible for pitting and long-term degradation of paper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIt turned out that these indicator papers capture almost the entire elemental profile of the ink, even though not every element influences their color response. I honestly don\u2019t know why no one had looked into this before. We combined the method with XRF analysis \u2013 we take the tests from exactly the same spot on the object and then analyze them in the lab, which allows us to directly compare both sets of data,\u201d explains the chemist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is how indicator papers became the foundation of a broader research project. Since 2014, Prof. Wagner, together with the Central Archives of Historical Records, has been systematically using them to analyze ink composition in historical manuscripts. They make it possible to compare ink recipes used across different periods and locations, ultimately helping to determine the provenance of documents, assess their condition, and predict the rate of degradation. It is a tool that allows researchers to read history not only through written words, but also through the very material those words were written on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/serwisnaukowy.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/stol_podswietlany.webp\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/serwisnaukowy.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Ballada_f-moll.3-1024x765.webp\")
Treasure hunters<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/serwisnaukowy.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Ballada.ChoPin-1024x748-1-1024x748.webp\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/serwisnaukowy.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/UV.1-1024x819.webp\")
Inks requiring close monitoring<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/serwisnaukowy.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/485299973_962931582710832_6074054718827709753_n-1024x768.webp\")
Two Chopins are better than one<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/serwisnaukowy.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/476898845_9622097321135364_7923212623304945088_n-1024x684.webp\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/serwisnaukowy.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/imgi_6_ed03781cdcf028d78b727a92d3293cf721c65946_50eeafdd31f53-1024x753.webp\")
The \u201cpaper strip library\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/serwisnaukowy.uw.edu.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Kwiatkowski_Chopins_Polonaise_detail.webp\")